Thanks for the input. I briefly read a quick synopsis of how it works months ago and obviously was off base.
There are "machines" which automate the process. I'm guessing that is what you meant by cryo "machine"? As for how it works metallurgically, it converts retained austenite into martensite. "Retained" austenite is austenite that was not converted to martensite during the quench process. Austenite is soft and not very strong. Martensite is hard and strong, but also very brittle and has considerable internal stress. This is why it needs to be tempered - the martensite needs to be converted to sorbite (or troosite), which although not as hard or strong is MUCH more ductile and has greater toughness and less notch sensitivity. Some alloys are double or even triple tempered after cryo treatment (or after heat treatment, where cryo treatment is not necessary or useful).
For case hardened steels like your gears, cryo treatment only affects the high carbon case (a layer about 1/32nd inch thick on the surface of the part). The bulk of the material has little response due to it's low carbon (and this austenite) content. Some steels don't retain hardly any austenite, and are unaffected by cryo treatment. This is a big problem in the off road world - folks think it makes ANY part stronger.
I wasn't sure if it was total fluff or not. I still don't know...he mentioned to me he used Sierra gear which uses a higher nickel content or some **** and that works better with the process. Again it could be true or not, I'm no genius when it comes to metal reacting with cold temps.
The only way for Sierra gears to have higher nickel is if they were made out of, say, 9310. Higher nickel carburizing steels are more expensive and requie longer heat treat cycle times, which means the end product is more expensive. Judging by the price of Sierra's, I would be surprised if this were the case. Not saying it isn't possible - AFAIK Sierra is a reboxer like Yukon. The gears are made by actual manufacturers, often offshore.
For 100-150 bucks I figured why the hell not and it ended up being cheaper then that. IIRC it was 80. I've broken 2 pinions so I thought what's the worst that can happen. I can go out and blow this thing tomorrow, I can get 2 years out of it like I did on the last one or get 5 years out of it, at the end of the day one thing remains the same, a 7.6in ring gear shouldn't be under a 5000+ lb truck.
I agree. It is well known that the simplest way to make a ring and pinion (or axle shafts, or pretty much anything else) stronger is to make them bigger.
My question though is this...your on pirate why do some guys swear by this process saying they were blowing R&Ps left and right and now their not?
Two possibilities: Either it is confirmation bias, or the cryo treatment actually worked. A gear manufacturer doesn't
have to cryo treat a set of gears, and not doing so saves money. Ever wonder why a set of Sierra or Yukon gears are $250 and a set of AAM or Spicer gears are $600+? Price depends on where they are made, how they are made, and what they are made of. If a set of gears was not cryo treated during manufacture than a cryo treatment could indeed be beneficial. So, is it the cryo treatment? Did they set the cryo treated gears up a bit differently? Or have they simply not beat on the cryo treated gears as hard/long as the broken ones? Without scientific testing there is no way to know.